1. Research Articles: Original research in various fields of science will be evaluated as research articles.
2. Reviews: Reviews of recent developments, improvements, discoveries and ideas in various fields of pure Science will be considered.
3. Letters to the Editor: These include opinions, comments relating to the publishing policy of the journal, news and suggestions. Letters are not to exceed a single page.
4. Short communications letters.
The editor reserves the right to decide that a paper may be treated as a research note.
Two volumes in a year. One volume composed of two issues.
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' (for more information on this and copyright, An e-mail will be sent to the corresponding author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Journal Publishing Agreement' form.
The authors are invited to submit papers in word and pdf formats through the journal online submission form with a cover letter. For detail submission procedure, kindly visit the page 'Submit a Manuscript”. For some other relevant information, we refer to 'Home' and 'Publication Policy' pages of this website.
Manuscripts should be prepared in English using a word processor. MS Word for Windows and .doc files are preferred. Manuscripts may be prepared with other software provided that the full document (with figures, schemes and tables inserted into the text) is exported to a MS Word format for submission. Times or Times New Roman font is preferred. The font size should be 12 pt. The papers must have abstract not exceeding 200 words and Keywords. Although variations in accord with contents of a manuscript are permissible, in general all papers should have the following sections: Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion, Conclusions, Acknowledgments (if applicable) and References. A template file may be downloaded here (doc file, pdf file).
All submissions will be acknowledged within a week of the submission. Authors are requested to suggest at least 3 independents referees (preferably non-native) with appropriate technical expertise although the editor may not necessarily approach them. Their affiliation and e-mail address should be provided as fully as possible.
We shall try our best to complete review process within 30 days from the date of submission. Article processing charge is not mandatory for all articles. However, we encourage for minimal charges from contributor’s research grant/institution to meet partially the processing expenditure and for sustainable growth of the journal. In order to preserve a high quality of this journal, the Editorial Board may wish to set some rules from time to time.
All references made to publications in the text should be presented in a list of references following the text of the manuscript.
The manuscript should be carefully checked to ensure that the information given in the text is exactly the same as that given in the reference list. References to the literature should be made according to the numerical system described below. In the text refer to the subject or to the author's name (without initial), followed by the reference number in square brackets. If reference is made in the text to publications written by more than two authors, the name of the first author should be used, followed by "et al.". The actual authors can be referred to, but the reference number(s) must always be given. Example: '..... as demonstrated [3,6]. Barnaby and Jones  obtained a different result ....' List: Note that in the reference list the names of authors and co-authors should be given in full.
Reference to a journal publication
 J. van der Geer, J.A.J. Hanraads, R.A. Lupton, J. Sci. Commun. 163 (2010) 51–59. Reference to a book:
 W. Strunk Jr., E.B. White, The Elements of Style, fourth ed., Longman, New York, 2000. Reference to a chapter in an edited book:
 G.R. Mettam, L.B. Adams, in: B.S. Jones, R.Z. Smith (Eds.), Introduction to the Electronic Age, E-Publishing, Inc. New York, 2009, pp. 281–304.
Conference proceedings, symposia, etc.
 A. G. Marshall In Kistemaker GE, Nibbering NMM (editors), Advances in Mass Spectrometry, Proc. 12th International Mass Spectrometry Conference, Amsterdam, 26 - 30 August 1991. Elsevier; 1992. p.37.
Abbreviations of journal titles should conform to those adopted by the Chemical Abstract Service (Biblioigraphic Guide for Editors and Authors, The American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1974). If the correct abbreviation is not known, the title should be given in full.
Reference to a personal communication should be followed by the year, e.g. A.N. Other, personal communication, 1989.
Peer review is a process of evaluation involving qualified individuals within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards, improve performance and provide credibility. In academia peer review is used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication.
We apply Single-blind peer review: Reviewers are aware of the identity of the authors, but authors are unaware of the identity of reviewers. There are at least three or more reviewers for the total number of articles in each issue. Reviewer of a manuscript will be non-native and independent to the author(s) as far as possible.
All submitted manuscripts will be reviewed for: Originality, Presentation and Contribution to new Knowledge.
Ethical and Malpractice Statement
The journal committed to maintaining a high academic standard. The publisher is non-political (i.e., only scholarly) and absolutely unbiased to any political party or ideology (religious, national, ideological), and completely research-based. Thus we are committed to maintain a high ethical standard and be absolutely impartial to anyone.
We expect similar standards from the editors and reviewers. Honesty, originality and fair dealing on the part of authors, and fairness, objectivity and confidentiality on the part of editors and reviewers are among the critical values that enable to achieve the journal aim.
Subdivision - numbered sections divide your article into clearly define and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1.1 (then 1.1.1, 1.1.2, ...), 1.2, etc. (the abstract is not included in section numbering). Use this numbering also for internal cross-referencing: do not just refer to 'the text'. Any subsection may be given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its own separate line.
State the objectives of the work and provide an adequate background, avoiding a detailed literature
survey or a summary of the results.
Provide sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced. Methods already published should be indicated by a reference: only relevant modifications should be described.
Results should be clear and concise.
This should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. A combined Results and Discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.
The following list will be useful during the final checking of an article prior to sending it to the journal for review. Please consult this Guide for Authors for further details of any item.
Ensure that the following items are present: One author has been designated as the corresponding author with contact details:
• E-mail address
• Full postal address
All necessary files have been uploaded, and contain:
• All figure captions
• All tables (including title, description, footnotes)
• Manuscript has been 'spell-checked' and 'grammar-checked'
• References are in the correct format for this journal
• All references mentioned in the Reference list are cited in the text, and vice versa
• Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including the Internet)
Printed version of figures (if applicable) in color or black-and-white
• Indicate clearly whether or not color or black-and-white in print is required.
• For reproduction in black-and-white, please supply black-and-white versions of the figures for printing purposes.